The State, does the following:
- Lies – “we’re improving the world” – reality “we’re destroying it, on purpose” to ‘achieve what we’re trying to do’
- Steals – “don’t steal, don’t pirate, don’t be violent” – they do all of that, or at least pay other people to do it (which is morally the same to me)
- Cheats – “…” – they cheat by using government against you, they cheat by using the information they have, that you don’t, against you, from the moment you are born, using it to entrap and enslave you (public schools, college trap, debt traps, unbalanced media symbolism, system designed to destroy families, etc.)
- Scares us into voluntary compliance and submission – false flag attacks, spinning things to their advantage, misdirection-overblowing bullshit to distract you from their important objective at the time.
I’m not sure how to best solve the shit these fuckers bag and sell wholesale, but I’m not buying any of it. That’s a start for me.
What should we do?
We need to think. We desperately need to think.
- They have superior technology (and other resources).
- They have guns pointed at us.
- They have a monopoly on what is acceptable and popular.
We need to think and solve this third problem bearing those first two things in mind. Our solutions should be like theirs. We should implement solutions that are passive ones. For example, if people do what is most natural and comfortable to them, that is what will help them in the long run. If people follow their instincts, go for the attractive girl, go for the popular guy, that is what will bring them a better life in the long run. Thus, we should be popular…attractive. If they listen to the music that sounds the most pleasing to them, performed by the sexiest artists, that’s what our solutions need to look like. This is a multilayered problem, any of us that are involved in the solution are good people, the things we do will be good things, by definition, so I don’t give a shit about philosophy on a high level. Everyone embraces the NAP, if they are part of the solution. They don’t have a double standard regarding force, violence, or fraud. So, when we accept this at the first, most basic level, and base everything we do on it, our choices are good and sensible. We don’t deal with evil people, we don’t deal with dishonest people, and we don’t deal with illogical people (to the extent that we can handle that problem).
With this out of the way, structure and implementation become more important. Aesthetics, instincts, gut reactions, these are far more important than ‘warm and fuzzies’ and these are where we should focus. To give an unrelated example, if you are selling a dessert, and it tastes amazing, and taste is your first priority, that’s great. That’s your base, so now the problem you have is that your packaging isn’t as appealing as your competition, well you’d want to upgrade it, right? That’s where we are. We need to be just as appealing as our competition. In all honesty, I’m not sure the best way to do that. I can talk about it in simple terms, but I don’t know how to take a socially awkward person and transform them into someone who is happy and centered and does well in social situations.
Except for ‘player school’ type education(pickup artistry, etc). Which isn’t the worst thing a socially awkward person can go through. It’s possible to be offputting to people who are overloaded with Christian values, so it comes across the wrong way to people, most of the time. ‘Player school’ is about teaching good people how to present themselves effectively, so they can communicate as well as their less-good counterparts, or about smoothing out the rough edges of those who need polishing.
And let me also add, let’s be intelligent. If you don’t think player school is about this…do you understand the result? Do you think it’s a good thing, if an intelligent person, with integrity, can also act intelligently, and socialize well? And not just speak intelligently…but also be understood, by all, by those with greater and lesser knowledge (and intelligence, in some cases)? This is the goal, for me, and it’s a worthy goal for us all, so regardless of any counterargument to the idea of what I consider pickup artistry to be, we have the opportunity to exercise intelligence, and learn what is good about it and use the effective elements in a way which we approve of, to help our cause. When you do this, you are acting with both intelligence and integrity.
This is one of the problems with the world today. We are dominated by a class of people who act with intelligence, and act without integrity. They are not all necessarily Satanists, but If I had any criticism —Sidebar— of Satanism, it would be this. There is integrity, only in the realm of violence and goodness in one’s circle. Once they hit their circle of ‘like-minded people’ and move outward, integrity goes out of the window. The rest of the world is considered lower class, less than human, regarded as a different species, if the Satanist considers him or herself a human. This is bullshit, a lack of empathy. All rational action must include both intelligence and integrity. In my view, Satanism, then, is reactionary, compared to religion. The new Satanist wakes up and says:
“Theists act without integrity. Theists act without rationality (intelligence), and harm and take advantage of others as they spread their irrational beliefs. These irrational beliefs unduly burden me. They harm my self-esteem and they harm who I am. These beliefs are an attack on my own self-worth. I am against them and I adopt rational beliefs (intelligent philosophy). I choose to strike back. I claim myself. I am who I am, and I stand confidently.”
And in standing, the Satanist reclaims their self-esteem, their self-worth, they save their enthusiasm. And that’s great. But they leave their integrity behind. This is their departure from rational philosophy.
Why ‘strike back?’ Why not just reject the abuser and walk away? Why not say, “fuck this, and move on.”
The Satanist says: “I choose to act in opposition to the Theist and theological philosophy. I will act with integrity, only with those that are like me. Only with the strong, that are like me. I claim my enthusiasm in my actions, because I act with power and strength. And I adopt the same lack of integrity, the same parasitic approach, outside of my circle.” Or maybe… it’s even worse. Maybe even more infantile…?
“I will get you back [you faceless, nameless society] for what you’ve done to me! Because you’ve made it difficult for my kind to exist, you Theists, you [loosely, Christians, but really all self-depriving, slave-faiths] ‘Christians’ especially you pitiful slaves, you deserve to be worse slaves than you are, now. Out of spite for you, I wish that your slavery be worse than it is, I rejoice in my superior knowledge and I hold you responsible for your slavery and happily take advantage of you. I am happy to be a parasite, a plague on you, just as your masters were (or would/could have been) a plague on me.”
And it’s ironic. Because the Satanist is ‘the enemy,’ the ‘adversary,’ is s/he not? Would not the Satanist play the role of Lucifer? In the Bible Lucifer brought the light. So Lucifer, the Satanist, then brings light, knowledge, the correct role (to follow the mythology) is to rise and Illuminate the cowering mass of slaves, in society. So the Satanist, to the degree which s/he takes their role from Christian mythology, they give freely the truth to the masses. But instead, they choose to hide what they know and walk in power and project that power, for their own aggrandizement. Instead of projecting ‘light power,’ “white magic”, if you will, they choose to project dark power, “black magic,” which is lame. Instead of deriding the weak, scaring them, and taking advantage of that which they have been conditioned to revile and recoil from, the Satanist could exist as someone to aspire to. A good role model, for the weak slavish Theist/’Christian.’ One can be Atheist and ‘Areligious’ without being anti-Christian in his/her values. To shock Theists/’Christians’ is at best, to stoop to their level. At worst, it’s sadistic. On another note, slaves are devoted followers. I suppose anyone who slavishly emulated you would be a distraction from or a perversion of the value system you intended to promote.
That would be lame, too… but back to the mythology. The light bringer could certainly illuminate without offending, one could be self-indulgent without ‘shock-value,’ the way rich people openly consume. (Enthusiasm). One could also be openly charitable without any irrational bullshit. And unapologetically awesome. Period. All of the three (enthusiasm-intelligence-integrity) without any of the negatives. Instead they choose to be those things, but also to hide their worship/spirituality in privacy (no comment on this, just stating it), and display their ‘positive’ qualities in an ‘offensive’ fashion.
This critique, in a sense, is social, and in a sense it’s more than social. But the crux of this is that the Satanist reclaims his enthusiasm, uses his intelligence, and abandons integrity, using it in a double-standard fashion. That’s not good enough for me, and it’s not good enough for a rational society. A rational society requires integrity, and rational people should turn their backs on any who lack integrity. That ensures a civilized society, because it kicks out people who act without integrity, who act without consideration, compassion, true humanity, it makes sure any would-be worthless, vagabond, uncivilized shitbags end up where they belong. Alone, and as far away from us as possible.
What sort of people would be good for shunning…people like those promoting bullshit in the entertainment industry. Those assholes promote slave values, they send mixed signals, such as popularizing consumption (novelty, frivolity) without popularizing intelligence (thrift, frugality) along with it. Or those that promote bullshit slave causes (protect ‘the environment’) which put forward integrity without intelligence (care and concern for others without care and concern for oneself). They pervert good help and true compassion by conflating it with sacrifice. Or the assholes in the political media, who make stupid remarks like people have “a right to healthcare” in a good society, thus promoting negative intelligence (this ‘right to healthcare’ doesn’t make any sense) with positive integrity (having empathy and compassion for others like you).
To add to this irony, the Satanist elevates him/herself, but only to the level of the parasitic ‘Christian’ she was once dominated by. She claims intelligence, claims enthusiasm, rescues, then, her self and her mind, from the ‘Christian’ master, and in doing so, becomes a master herself. Think ‘slave morality’ vs. ‘master morality,’ ala Nietzsche. But she owns only half of her integrity. Society is to be society, only to the degree to which those who have as much power as we do, exist? Though to be fair, Satanists stated values are not to harm children. But why bother saying that, if you wish ill on your fellow human slaves? Any human that would oppose a Satanist, is a child, until the light of reason touches them, both in mind and heart. Does that not make sense? I am really asking, here, too…because I find a contradiction here.
1-Those who would disagree with rational philosophy (I am just realizing that this term is redundant, but it’s necessary to state it this way, in this period in time… so those who would disagree) could simply be ignorant. In that case, why treat them as lesser beings. I would be happy, personally appeased if the Satanist ‘plan’ was to ignore irrational people who choose to be ignorant, even when the truth is before them. That is the rational way.
2-Those who would harm children are clearly harming the defenseless, and those who would harm the ignorant ‘on paper’ (either with the threat of government force, or harm them through economic trickery) are doing the same thing. They are just harming a different kind of child. Children are non fully-developed adults. So a child is simply an (usually) enthusiastic adult who lacks knowledge (one piece to effectiveness/intelligence) and discipline (non fully-developed brain, still learning integrity). These ignorant adults, then, (possibly, counter arguments welcome) lack knowledge, or integrity, likely because they’ve been psychologically damaged. Most of the people I’ve talked to, about the truth, refuse to accept it, because it means they’d have to deal with either some profound neglect or have a lot of catching up to do, they would have to learn how to take care of themselves, in a serious sense. Another equally common problem is the trauma of the truth. It is simply a shock to many, and most people wish to remain in their comfort zone, and not deal with it. I can’t fucking blame them, either. I’d rather be comfortable, too. And these people are probably pretty set and in a good place…I guess, right? I don’t know.
Let’s clarify these two points. Discuss if you can resolve any confusion created here. Because if Satanists were not double-standard wielding nihilists, I would be one, too. I believe a healthy, rational person, understands, and expresses positive enthusiasm, intelligence, and integrity, and I believe the three feed on and encourage and protect each other in a well functioning personality. The Satanist misses the point. He expresses positive intelligence, negative enthusiasm, and negative integrity. (I’ve explained how above.) Rational philosophy would go a step further. From my perspective, Libertarians/Voluntarists are practitioners of rational philosophy. (Reminder, that those public people who are part of the Libertarian party are Libertarian. Liberty and politics do not mix. They talk about the NAP, but do not follow it to all of its rational conclusions.) A Libertarian would defend the ignorant, probably through Agorism.
The Libertarian would distinguish between those who held or were sympathetic to irrational ideals and those who acted on them, and would deal with people with integrity, and avoid (freeze-out) people without it. This way the hostile ignorant would be left out in the cold, and the passive ignorants, those who went along (which is most people) would not be taken advantage of. To whatever degree they could be part of the solution, they would blindly contribute to it. Which would be a good that negates the kind of bad we see from the same people today: the opposite of the way ‘warm and fuzzy’ people become teachers and blindly indoctrinate and brainwash young children, thinking they are doing a ‘public service.’ (That’s only a half-truth, anyway. I suspect most of the people who work for the government are lazy and are bullies at heart.) The same way (almost all) soldiers, police officers, government employees, political activists, etc., end up promoting the problem and contributing to others’ enslavement.
There’s a “release valve” that when used, can allow someone to accept the truth, because they’ve been properly prepared for it. I don’t know what that is. If that’s not true, we can go the route of the State. We can choose to promote rational philosophy, and propagate it such a way that it takes hold with the young, and we leave older people alone, and our opponents simply die off. This is how statism and the fucking ‘socialist paradise’ have taken hold.
Sidebar over. Socializing is a ‘game’ or an art and there’s a ‘theory and practice’ for every art. Schooling/training is about teaching the theory/practical aspects of an art. That’s what you do. That’s what people need to do when they are presenting themselves socially, and it’s what we need to do as a movement. We Libertarians, we Voluntarists, we need to go to ‘player school.’ We need to present our awesome philosophy both emotionally as well as intellectually.